WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs)

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs)
From: Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2011年1月27日 16:02:53 +0000
Delivery-date: 2011年1月27日 08:04:51 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110127083537.GD29664@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FF9BC.40601@xxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.4007da378a.AANLkTiku=-RhcyUZVHmwnJ18+Az6Fk5CxdEjKdHQKJ54@xxxxxxxxxxxx om> <4D4032C7.9000003@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin+K5G10_03qLRT_yqCRELu339roLEHy1bVFoqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D4064CD.8010005@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB9292@trantor > <20110127083537.GD29664@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adi Kriegisch wrote:
What AoE actually does is sending a frame per block. Block size is 4K -- so
no need for fragmentation. The overhead is pretty low, because we're
talking about Ethernet frames.
Most iSCSI issues I have seen are with reordering of packages due to
transmission across several interfaces. So what most people recommend is to
keep the number of interfaces to two. To keep performance up this means you
have to use 10G, FC or similar which is quite expensive -- especially if
you'd like to have a HA SAN network (HSRP and stuff like that is required).
AoE does not suffer from those issues: Using 6 GBit interfaces is no
problem at all, load balancing will happen automatically, as the load is
distributed equally across all available interfaces. HA is very simple:
just use two switches and connect one half of the interfaces to one switch
and the other half to the other switch. (It is recommended to use switches
that can do jumbo frames and flow control)
Getting somewhat off-topic, but I'm interested to know how AoE handles network errors ? I assume there is some handshake to make sure packets were delivered, rather than just "fire and forget" !
--
Simon Hobson
Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Problem using xm suspend / xm save , develop@xxxxxxxxxx
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Adi Kriegisch
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs , Adi Kriegisch
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] AoE (Was: iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs) , Javier Guerra Giraldez
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /