WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet errors rolli

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet errors rolling across screen
From: Gerry Reno <grenoml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年4月21日 16:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Delivery-date: 2010年4月21日 16:50:10 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1271893712; bh=8jPGBzqqLNO+eqgz8I7zdTKnUqxYl8V3GMyyxPCTqSE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vGQHJtp/6zMBbhDx86+643TdG+pkrLuZRbsnQvpadeJ44+Jp3q5TDY4yNw77mJH3E6shuDTuEyq08CftAHzhxJyFL/rGIezCGugx0qCb4pr+RuXtpBQI2l3ido4AN9Mv1Fe5GCcZdSoX7S96KRmIVOl/lp+jc0hUKJHd5/9BWe8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=werLCHpuBjw57iSnN0R1m4e4beeJyIgO6q7BnYDsGZ8cytoNVCS3ovFVaJ01AZUZ+ZBhyeYjzOGcBJlB/kGSKOLZjaijI0sOZGmnPgdBKAItvQqj4vCIdfz3PVbyReZEmejfKgeoFzzsWylipBqAzhobrAU+G4SxgrWe+cxm5oM=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <15022.38276.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Gerry Reno <grenoml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Gerry Reno <grenoml@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet errors 
> rolling across screen
> To: "Gerry Reno" <grenoml@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 7:42 PM
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:41:35AM
> -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:19:39PM +0300, Pasi
> Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >>   
> >>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:40:04PM -0700,
> Brandon Lamb wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and
> using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have 6 linux debian guests running, and
> on my host console i am
> >>>> getting these errors rolling pretty
> constantly.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP
> packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet"
> >>>>
> >>>> I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off
> and same thing on peth0,
> >>>> using bridged mode for network config.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any tips? Google is failing me, im not
> sure what to even search for
> >>>> other than "xen Attempting to checksum a
> non-TCP/UDP packet".
> >>>>
> >>>> Im wondering if this has something to do
> with why my guests were
> >>>> seeming to have network timeout/freezing
> problems, I thought maybe
> >>>> upgrading from 3.4 to 4.0 would magically
> solve it.
> >>>>
> >>>>       
> >>> All the networking stuff is done on the dom0
> Linux kernel,
> >>> so Xen upgrade doesn't affect that.
> >>>
> >>> Although most probably you also upgraded dom0
> kernel..
> >>>
> >>> Can you please post output of:
> >>>
> >>> - ethtool peth0
> >>> - ethtool -i peth0
> >>> - brctl show
> >>> - ifconfig -a
> >>>
> >>>     
> >>
> >> And also:
> >> - ethtool -k peth0
> >>
> >> -- Pasi
> >>   
> >
> > Hi Pasi,
> >  I saw this post and I'm experiencing this
> checksumming problem as well.  
> > The setup is eucalyptus and whenever we try to ping an
> 'instance'  
> > machine from outside the cloud controller we see these
> errors.  Also  
> > when we try to ping from inside the instance to the
> public network.  We  
> > are running in NOVLAN mode across a bridge.
> >
> > Here are some details:  stats from the 'node
> controller' (which launches  
> > the instances)
> >
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~# ethtool eth0
> > Settings for eth0:
> >        Supported ports: [ TP MII
> ]
> >        Supported link
> modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> >               
>                
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> >               
>                
> 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
> >        Supports auto-negotiation:
> Yes
> >        Advertised link
> modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> >               
>                
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> >               
>                
> 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
> >        Advertised
> auto-negotiation: Yes
> >        Speed: 1000Mb/s
> >        Duplex: Full
> >        Port: MII
> >        PHYAD: 0
> >        Transceiver: internal
> >        Auto-negotiation: on
> >        Supports Wake-on: pumbg
> >        Wake-on: g
> >        Current message level:
> 0x00000033 (51)
> >        Link detected: yes
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~#
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~#
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~# ethtool -i eth0
> > driver: r8169
> > version: 2.3LK-NAPI
> > firmware-version:
> > bus-info: .&checktime(0000,02,00,':').0
> >
>
> Ok, so Realtek NIC.
>
>
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~#
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~#
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~# which brctl
> > /usr/sbin/brctl
> > You have new mail in /var/mail/root
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~#
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~# brctl show
> > bridge name     bridge id 
>              STP
> enabled     interfaces
> > br0         
>    8000.00241d1905df   
>    no         
>     eth0
> >               
>                
>                
>         vif3.0
> >               
>                
>                
>         vif4.0
> > tmpbridge           
>    8000.000000000000   
>    no
> > virbr0         
> 8000.000000000000       yes
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~#
>
> <snip>
>
> > root@grp-01-23-02:~# ethtool -k eth0
> > Offload parameters for eth0:
> > Cannot get device flags: Operation not supported
> > rx-checksumming: on
> >
>
> Did you try disabling rx-checksumming? 
Yes, just gives me 'Operation not supported.'
>
> > tx-checksumming: off
> > scatter-gather: off
> > tcp-segmentation-offload: off
> > udp-fragmentation-offload: off
> > generic-segmentation-offload: off
> > generic-receive-offload: off
> > large-receive-offload: off
> >
> > We are running ubuntu enterprise cloud 1.6 with a
> pv_ops dom0 kernel  
> > (2.6.31.6) compiled from Jeremy's git tree back about
> December.
> >
>
> Ok. Did you try upgrading the dom0 kernel? 
>
> -- Pasi
Not yet. What version should I be compiling now. From Jeremy's tree still?
-Gerry
Took me a while to respond because my ISP email went down earlier and is still 
down. So I registered another account.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL xen vs kvm , Nathan Stratton
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] can any one help with NAT using xen 3.4.1 , Tapas Mishra
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet errors rolling across screen , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet errors rolling across screen , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /