WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?

To: Fabiano Francesconi <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?
From: "jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年4月13日 01:11:26 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2010年4月12日 16:12:16 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100412185638.GA19087@whitebox >
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100411103057.GA3244@whitebox > <h2jf4527be1004110655g4d61faa9va243867256de8a0f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100412185638.GA19087@whitebox >
Reply-to: jp.pozzi@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 20:56 +0200, Fabiano Francesconi a écrit :
> Ok the problem seems solved.
> An ##xen irc user, jamon, told me to add 'elevator=noop' as kernel
> bootflag in order to disable I/O scheduler on the domU.
>
> This is quite interesting since, as he states "getting different guests
> all trying to read/write at the same time with different schedulers, or
> even different kernels (linux cf. windows cf. bsd etc.) isn't as good as
> letting the host do all the heavy lifting and not have to worry about
> different write caches, flushing etc. that different guests might be doing.
>
> Actually I was wondering about my situation. My whole disk is passed
> entirely to the domU so this shouldn't be a problem at all.
>
> After rebooting the machine what I get is:
>
> real 0m16.993s
> user 0m0.009s
> sys 0m1.143s
>
much work was done on IO on the last kernel versions, and the most
recent ones are speedier than older, but some things changed (for
example the "Anticipatory scheduler" is gone away in .33) and some
tweaking has to be done.
regards
JPP
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] how to access 4 application servers web based , jpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] P2V question , Mark Pryor
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression? , Fabiano Francesconi
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] Xen-tools , Fischer Udo Attila
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /