WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?
From: Fabiano Francesconi <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年4月11日 12:30:57 +0200
Delivery-date: 2010年4月11日 03:33:11 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=n3Bwt5E7zHLJzTLO9M0EXN63LnlUUbJPIfsAZanNypY=; b=llYrcASt+39Wn7hJFn0AWItws4iMy4d/tjEdzwDKLuP8tUVtdUft+so5FGgAUVjuF3 hn5ybWNyWsOknjbXmsj5DpQsQLJhEZz7kSMYgaBpHWyrmBcT00b7kfq8X9U/jEjskxZf bwpZsKxUpFuxbeEeprV3N1MCT9/RcnX+HabWs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=YQMHe27iIEdPJ9PHuICpYtoVJ4m1KrduGfzdpnqw+MxRt+X3gUuBUYTphrCOiRSskK yUo2S+4pvsshgW7Sq6eCAOmTKddn5/kiw3EpShCF23wzZcQxfjrhz1KDe7u4YPfBaTmW 8v6eFtzz0Dl1tfXgDBHyebsp8ODr2/a5UUGfg=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009年06月14日)
Hello there,
I'm noticing a performance regression for what's matter the hard-disk I
pass to the domU (aquaria).
The slow-down is very noticeable even when moving small videos file
(~350mb).
In the configuration file of the domU, I pass the whole disk
('phy:/dev/sdb,xvdb,w') to the guest OS.
The distribution under both systems is Gentoo/Linux, x86 arch.
The hypervisor is always the same, in both scenarios (Linux xevelon
2.6.32-xen-r1 #1 SMP Sat Apr 10 13:37:02 CEST 2010 i686 Intel(R)
Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux).
The machine is an Atom, so it's not capable of any VT technology but so
far it's a great machine and XEN is working just fine on it.
I attach you few logs I've gathered.
Thank you
-- 
Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461]

Attachment: 2.6.29-xen-r4.config
Description: Text document

Attachment: aquaria.cfg
Description: Text document

Attachment: dmesg.2.26.29
Description: Text document

Attachment: dmesg.2.26.32
Description: Text document

Attachment: regression.log
Description: Text document

Attachment: 2.6.32-xen-r1.config
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] no bridge is shown by ifconfig on Xen Debian , Tapas Mishra
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE Xen dom0 Patches , Boris Derzhavets
Previous by Thread: [Xen-users] XCP, creating a metric and looking for input , Vern Burke
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression? , Andrew Lyon
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /