WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation
From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月25日 13:10:32 +0100
Delivery-date: 2006年1月25日 12:19:27 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lG8ULKQ80oAsvuEfeH3jdjs+fRi9Ffm1Y733OaIhIHvG0+mvz/JrzBtGAcckW7nkm3AmCrHu4QNsARyaSTd0NPwyaE+EqTf+OgkVcMV8uIO1jqP3SCosY13bnMajCJK2qiBDnx+2+Wft3i9YStWDNNIOv5YS7uuHjnmvR57i/6Y=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060120143320.96186.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060120143320.96186.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Steven Anderson wrote:
> I would really like to see someone with experience on this start a wiki. I
> think a lot of people could benifit from it.
That would be nice.
I'd be happy to contribute my experiences when I get more time.
(Which will probably be a couple of months from now, but anyway.)
Personally, I'd like to see some more information on filesystems that
zero blocks when they're freed and COW implementations that nukes
blocks that gets zeroed from the write target :-).
> I also wonder what kind of performance and overhead a COW setup would have?
I've seen suggestions that unionfs adds about 15% overhead in a test setup.
It's of course dependant on your setup..
The more filesystems you add on top of each other, the slower it will
get, I imagine.
OTOH, dentrys are usually cached, so it might not be that big in the
common case.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] NetBSD-domU on debian-dom0? , Martti Kuparinen
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] How was CoW implemented on the Demo LiveCD (3.0) ?? , Anand
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation , Steven Anderson
Next by Thread: AW: [Xen-users] Fibre Channel Problem , DIEDERIT
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /