WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation

To: "Petersson, Mats" <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation
From: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月10日 17:50:28 +0530
Cc: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年1月10日 12:26:51 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=LW4/SlsUiCYAMqsBF195fEIL2NKVxgxTB7ljv1h9kVHunekaE9or+XaTX4FTGQT4zdwmf8fa0pf2ZtOZR+ePMNwaX55Za2teLdmEsMTlg0a8aQxVBN0hoZ9ybXjH25DZ5hwguzTHWmkxGBuic2xjxpUd2ppnFvNsBQuAcNNSHLk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B0EAB7B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B0EAB7B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 1/10/06, Petersson, Mats <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Gzip will use up a fair amount of cpu-time, but the time it take to transfer the image that is 30-70% smaller is significantly more than the CPU-time it's taken, so unless you have something else productive to do with your cpu whilst you're backing up/transferring the file(s), you're probably better off compressing the file(s).

Well my backup server is going to be just sitting on the next rack probably so the network transfer won't affect much. As compared to cpu time, i would rather prefer to use the cpu time for processing inside the domains than for running tar+gzip.

Hmm... given this, one solution would be to run some kind of background process which monitors the cpu usage, when its low, run the backup service, if there is a demand of the cpu by any process/ domain, just pause the backup and resume whenever cpu becomes free. However if the host keeps on being too much busy always the backup process can be hanged up in memory for ages (have seen this myself).

--

regards,

Anand
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen alternatives , Pierre \"Le Pierrot\"
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen alternatives , Anand
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation , Petersson, Mats
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation , Steven Anderson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /