WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler

To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler
From: Matt Ayres <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月19日 09:35:44 -0500
Cc: Xen Users <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年1月19日 14:43:43 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43CF162C.5000800@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: TekTonic
References: <acb757c00601100317y36f100c7n308042ac373273c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0601101137320.6446-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00601151253o2744d8bpce7dabcac90ec933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00601171257i5a76ceadr10957e10891f5661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00601171305i58876452p2983ff0acb22d62b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acb757c00601171311t61a45254r8a6ea77bed5cc422@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43CF162C.5000800@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
Gerd,
Just an FYI I'm tracking -unstable these days due to problems with xend hanging with too many requests to it... side note, because of this I'm using the CFQ scheduler and no more complaints from users regarding I/O wait and no panics related to CFQ (actually no panics at all, now we just need to ditch xend!).
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Anand wrote:
Just had a thought, since those changes are in the kernel files it,
can't we just compile the kernel off the unstable and then use that for
domU. This way disk io features would be available to in any version.
No, it's in the backend driver, thus you have to replace the dom0
kernel. No protocol changes, so you can just drop-in the new kernel and
everything should work.
However can any developer or someone can confirm if this is ok ? And how
do we verify if the IO scheduler working ? from the host ? inside dom U ?
With the new dom0 kernel you'll have one kernel thread per virtual block
device. This helps the I/O scheduler (which uses the PID to decide how
to group/queue requests) to do a better job. It also allows you to
tweak the priorities using ionice (comes with recent util-linux versions).
cheers,
 Gerd
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Subject: Re: [Xen-users] boot existing OS , John S Little
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] 2.0.7 -> 3.0.0 upgrade , Ralph Passgang
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler , Gerd Hoffmann
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler , Anand
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /