WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月10日 02:19:31 +0000
Cc: tbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年1月10日 02:38:20 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0601091344151.28574-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0601091344151.28574-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
> Cool. I didn't know some of this stuff existed... e.g.
> Documentation/block/ioprio.txt
Yeah, it's pretty funky stuff :-)
> Can anyone tell what (if any) knowledge XEN has of this? Can it pass I/O
> priorities from a domU to the dom0, or can we assign I/O priorities to a
> whole domU ?
IIRC, there's some work going on to allow the second of those points, think 
there's a patch circulating.
Re. passing priorities through... you get to do that implicitly, by the order 
in which domU requests come through. But this obviously doesn't give a 
priority relative to domUs... You could implement something like that but 
you'd have to trust all your domUs not to starve each other and dom0 itself, 
so it'd probably not be so widely applicable.
Definitely handy that this stuff is in the kernel though - IIRC, the pluggable 
scheduler stuff went in last year, so it's quite recent.
Cheers,
Mark
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Mogens Valentin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > On non-xen, yes. There's some benchmarks somewhere (don't seem to find
> > them right now) about advanteges of the various ones.
> > /usr/src/linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt says a few words.
> >
> > As you've seen for yourself, the scheduler can be changed runtime, and
> > likewise as a boot option.
> > My understanding is that schedulers works fairly directly on hardware,
> > at least reorganizing disk queues, I -think- you cannot have different
> > schedulers for dom0 and domU's.
> > Why would you? It's the same physical disk...
> > I believe cfq is usually considered the most versatile, unless specific
> > needs are determined.
>
> Looks that way... from my 5 minutes of reading...
>
> -Tom
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> tbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | What I like about deadlines is the lovely
> http://BareMetal.com/ | whooshing they make as they rush past.
> web hosting since '95 | - Douglas Adams
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation , Molle Bestefich
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen alternatives , Mark Williamson
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler , tbrown
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] io scheduler , Anand
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /