WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus

Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus
From: "Timothy J. Moore" <Timothy.Moore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年1月27日 12:39:16 +0000
Accept-language: en-US, en-GB
Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Cc: "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年1月27日 04:39:43 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100126181758.083e0795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20100126121408.3ef44f76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be1001261337ld9183f5o513369c1e6c3587f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100126181758.083e0795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acqe9wsRQrcwOKsBT1qtD9rkADvsSwAVqRbg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus
Its definitely a Sun box ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mukesh Rathor
Sent: 27 January 2010 02:18
To: Andrew Lyon
Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus
On 2010年1月26日 21:37:28 +0000
Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Mukesh Rathor
> <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I kinda vaguely remember seeing a patch while ago to support 128
> > physical cpus by hypervisor, I believe it was from Jan B. Now
> > looking for it i'm unable to find it, i only see HVM vcpu patch for
> > 128 vcpus in my search.
> >
> > Firstly, is it OK to increase NR_CPUS to 128, and secondly is it ok
> > to do so in 3.4.3-rc2-pre tree, or is it 4.0 only?
> >
> > thanks much,
> > mukesh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
> >
>
> There exists a x86 system with 128 cpus? What is it?
>
> andy
unfortunately, i'm not allowed to disclose since it's a pre-release.
but the hardware vendor will announce soon. 
HT makes it 128 for xen btw.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.0 + Kernel 2.6.32 + Debian , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Qestion to gfx-passthrough to HVM linux domU , Dietmar Hahn
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus , Mukesh Rathor
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] [crash] (But on broken hardware) , Daniel Stodden
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /