| To: | "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus |
| From: | Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2010年1月26日 12:14:08 -0800 |
| Cc: | JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2010年1月26日 12:14:03 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, I kinda vaguely remember seeing a patch while ago to support 128 physical cpus by hypervisor, I believe it was from Jan B. Now looking for it i'm unable to find it, i only see HVM vcpu patch for 128 vcpus in my search. Firstly, is it OK to increase NR_CPUS to 128, and secondly is it ok to do so in 3.4.3-rc2-pre tree, or is it 4.0 only? thanks much, mukesh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0 + PVOPS + Intel VTD + USB EHCI = BUG() , Pasi Kärkkäinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: dom0 pvops crash when used as domU kernel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] pvops dom0: no sound after boot; possibly causedby swiotlb , Ronny . Hegewald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |