WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking

To: Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>, Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年1月21日 14:01:11 +0000
Cc: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年1月21日 06:01:36 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B584CAF.10909@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acqal8mfLqvuk22wS2uggTtadYaw9gACmYgx
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
On 21/01/2010 12:46, "Weidong Han" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If DRHD does not have existent devices, ignore it.
>> If DRHD has both existent and non-existent devices, consider it invalid
>> and not register.
>> 
>
> Although you patch workarounds your buggy BIOS, but we still need to
> enable it for security purpose as I mentioned in previous mail. We
> needn't workaround / fix all BIOS issues in software. I think security
> is more important for this specific BIOS issue. Did you report the BIOS
> issue to your OEM vendor? maybe it's better to get it fixed in BIOS.
If VT-d cannot be correctly enabled on a particualr system, should we not
warn-and-disable (partially disable or completely disable) rather than fail
to boot? If we want to fail to boot, that is what the iommu=force option is
there for.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT-d] Dis-allow PCI device assignment if PoD is enabled , George Dunlap
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate / graphics passthru , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking , Weidong Han
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking , Sander Eikelenboom
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /