On 21/01/2010 10:19, "Weidong Han" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry this is typo.
>> I mean:
>> So, I think RMRR that has no-existent device is "invalid"
>> and whole RMRR should be ignored.
>> 
> looks reasonable.
>
> Keir, I Acks Noboru's rmrr patch. Or do you want us to merge them to one
> patch?
Merge them up, re-send with both sign-off and acked-by all in one email.
 Thanks,
 Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel