WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / cras

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / crash
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: 2009年8月10日 22:27:50 +0300
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2009年8月10日 12:28:16 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A805053.5010509@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A67651D.7040300@xxxxxxxx> <20090722193530.GR24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090722195748.GS24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A6775C9.5010802@xxxxxxxx> <20090722205346.GU24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A70B585.2070109@xxxxxxxx> <20090730084800.GT24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090730113532.GV24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090810164330.GA24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A805053.5010509@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006年08月11日)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:52:35AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/10/09 09:43, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Did I mess up something here or was this patch against some other tree than
> > rebase/master? 
> > 
>
> No, it needed another change in there. rebase/master now has that fix
> in it, but I'm seeing other interrupt-related strangeness which I still
> don't understand. I'd be interested in any reports you have about
> current rebase/master.
>
I just updated rebase/master and rebuilt (now 2.6.31-rc5).
http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-log-11-rebase-master-with-highpte.txt
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<c058c93f>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0xcc/0x13f
*pdpt = 000000003d276001 
Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP 
last sysfs file: 
Modules linked in:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.31-rc5 #21) P8SC8
EIP: 0061:[<c058c93f>] EFLAGS: 00010046 CPU: 0
EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0xcc/0x13f
EAX: 00000000 EBX: ffffffff ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00000000 EDI: c08ed558 EBP: c087eedc ESP: c087eea0
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: e021
Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=c087e000 task=c083b1a0 task.ti=c087e000)
Stack:
 00001aa5 00000220 00000200 00000000 00000000 00000000 e3201014 c08ed558
<0> c087eee4 f5681000 e3201010 00000000 00000000 c09027f8 f54ff000 c087ef20
<0> c04099a7 00000000 c09027f8 f54ff000 c09027f8 f54ff000 c087ef20 c0843f70
Call Trace:
 [<c04099a7>] ? xen_do_upcall+0x7/0xc
 [<c0404591>] ? xen_pte_clear+0x9/0x12
 [<c0427bf8>] ? set_pte_vaddr+0xb4/0xc4
 [<c0426e80>] ? __native_set_fixmap+0x25/0x30
 [<c040472a>] ? xen_set_fixmap+0xc7/0xcc
 [<c0897f6c>] ? mem_init+0x24a/0x298
 [<c088367e>] ? start_kernel+0x14b/0x2cd
 [<c088336f>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x18e
 [<c0883082>] ? i386_start_kernel+0x71/0x79
 [<c088618d>] ? xen_start_kernel+0x52f/0x538
Code: d0 89 45 cc 89 55 c8 eb 16 0f bc c8 03 4d d4 8b 04 8a 83 f8 ff 74 f8
8b 55 e4 e8 42 e3 e7 ff 8b 55 f0 8b 45 d0 03 
05 1c 1c 97 c0 <8b> 0c 10 8b 55 e8 8b 45 cc 23 0c 82 8b 45 c8 8b 04 82 8b 15
18 
EIP: [<c058c93f>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0xcc/0x13f SS:ESP e021:c087eea0
CR2: 0000000000000000
---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
(gdb) list *0xc058c93f
0xc058c93f is in active_evtchns (drivers/xen/events.c:237).
232
233 static inline unsigned long active_evtchns(unsigned int cpu,
234 struct shared_info *sh,
235 unsigned int idx)
236 {
237 return (sh->evtchn_pending[idx] &
238 cpu_evtchn_mask(cpu)[idx] &
239 ~sh->evtchn_mask[idx]);
240 }
241
(gdb) 
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] HVM and WIndows NT , Alexandre CABROL PERALES
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] HVM and WIndows NT , Alexandre CABROL PERALES
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / crash , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / crash with 2.6.31-rc5 32bit PAE , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /