WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / cras

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / crash
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: 2009年8月10日 19:43:30 +0300
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2009年8月10日 09:43:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090730113532.GV24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20090715082242.GB24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090721130342.GQ24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A67651D.7040300@xxxxxxxx> <20090722193530.GR24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090722195748.GS24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A6775C9.5010802@xxxxxxxx> <20090722205346.GU24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A70B585.2070109@xxxxxxxx> <20090730084800.GT24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090730113532.GV24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006年08月11日)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:35:32PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>> Actually CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO was enabled, if you meant that? 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >> Yes, that's it.
> > > >> 
> > > >>> (gdb) x/i 0xc058cdcb
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >> Try "list *0xc058cdcb".
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > > >
> > > > (gdb) list *0xc058cdcb
> > > > 0xc058cdcb is in active_evtchns (drivers/xen/events.c:237).
> > > > 232
> > > > 233 static inline unsigned long active_evtchns(unsigned int cpu,
> > > > 234 struct shared_info 
> > > > *sh,
> > > > 235 unsigned int idx)
> > > > 236 {
> > > > 237 return (sh->evtchn_pending[idx] &
> > > > 238 cpu_evtchn_mask(cpu)[idx] &
> > > > 239 ~sh->evtchn_mask[idx]);
> > > > 240 }
> > > > 241
> > > > (gdb)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Pasi
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Does this help?
> > > 
> > 
> > I'll try it later today. 
> > 
>
> I did "git pull" to get the latest 2.6.31-rc4 tree, and the patch fails to
> apply..
>
> [root@dom0test linux-2.6-xen]# git pull
>
> [root@dom0test linux-2.6-xen]# git reset --hard
> HEAD is now at ef843c1 Merge commit 'v2.6.31-rc4' into rebase/master
>
> [root@dom0test linux-2.6-xen]# patch -p1 < 
> xen-pvops-dom0-use-proper-percpu-variable-for-cpu_evtchan_mask.patch
> patching file drivers/xen/events.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 93.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 232 (offset 12 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 262 (offset 12 lines).
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 935.
> 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/xen/events.c.rej
>
> Looking at the patch and comparing to my drivers/xen/events.c it seems not
> the same version..
>
Did I mess up something here or was this patch against some other tree than
rebase/master? 
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Guidance needed , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / crash , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Guidance needed , Richard Bowser
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] What is the current state of Dom0 kernel support? / crash , Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /