| To: | Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, RFC] x86: make the GDT per-CPU |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2008年9月11日 14:15:51 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2008年9月11日 06:16:23 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <48C92E69.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AckUEIMzwciO1IADEd2NXQAX8io7RQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH, RFC] x86: make the GDT per-CPU |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 11/9/08 13:42, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> No, this would break 32-bits at least: The GDT entry for the selector >> loaded into TR must remain a valid, busy TSS descriptor for the whole >> lifetime of the system. So it can't be shared with the LDT. But even for >> 64-bits I would fear using the same GDT slot for both LDT and GDT >> loading. > > Actually, there's a second aspect here, too (again for 32-bits): As a > follow-up patch I'm planning to make the double fault TSS per-CPU, too. > This wasn't as simple with the global GDT as it would be with the per-CPU > one. Well, the extra LGDT looks like it will take about 130 cycles on Core-2 hardware. I suppose that is tolerable. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d scalability issue , Zhai, Edwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/4] CPU online/offline support in Xen , Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, RFC] x86: make the GDT per-CPU , Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] kernel BUG at arch/i386/mm/hypervisor.c , "T. Eichstädt" |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |