On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 09:44:58AM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > > But how much of the degradation is due to IOTLB pressure and how
> much
> > > is due to vcpu pinning? If vcpu pinning doesn't give you much then
> > > why add the automatic pinning just to get a little improvement on
> > > older CPUs hooked up to a VT-d chipset?
> > 
> > Say, throughput of 1 pass-through domain is 100%,
> > if not pin vcpu, average throughput of 8 pass-through domain is 59%.
> > If pin vcpu, average is 95%.
> > 
> > So you can see how much vcpu pinning contribute to the performance.
>
> For comparison, what are the results if you use a penryn with wbinvd
> exit support?
The penryn system has no much processor for scalability test, so I have no 
data:(
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>
>
> > >
> > > eSk
> > >
> > >
> > > > Randy (Weidong)
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >> [And talking of IOTLB pressure, why can't Intel document the
> IOTLB
> > > >> sizes in the chipset docs? Or even better, why can't these
> values
> > be
> > > >> queried from the chipset?]
> > > >>
> > > >> eSk
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> [Edwin Zhai]
> > > >>> Keir,
> > > >>> I have found a VT-d scalability issue and want to some feed
> > backs.
> > > >>
> > > >>> When I assign a pass-through NIC to a linux VM and increase the
> > num
> > > >>> of VMs, the iperf throughput for each VM drops greatly. Say,
> > start 8
> > > >>> VM running on a machine with 8 physical cpus, start 8 iperf
> > client
> > > >>> to connect each of them, the final result is only 60% of 1 VM.
> > > >>
> > > >>> Further investigation shows vcpu migration cause "cold" cache
> for
> > > >>> pass-through domain. following code in vmx_do_resume try to
> > > >>> invalidate orig processor's cache when 14 migration if this
> > domain
> > > >>> has pass-through device and no support for wbinvd vmexit.
> > > >>
> > > >>> 16 if ( has_arch_pdevs(v->domain) && !cpu_has_wbinvd_exiting ) {
> > > >>> int cpu = v->arch.hvm_vmx.active_cpu;
> > > >>> if ( cpu != -1 )
> > > >>> on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of_cpu(cpu), wbinvd_ipi, NULL, 1,
> > > >>
> > > >>> }
> > > >>
> > > >>> So we want to pin vcpu to free processor for domains with
> > > >>> pass-through device in creation process, just like what we did
> > for
> > > >>> NUMA system.
> > > >>
> > > >>> What do you think of it? Or have other ideas?
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> best rgds,
> > > >>> edwin
> > > >>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> Xen-devel mailing list
> > > >>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Xen-devel mailing list
> > > >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > best rgds,
> > edwin
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
>
-- 
best rgds,
edwin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel