| To: | "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? |
| From: | "Neo Jia" <neojia@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2008年8月29日 13:35:48 -0700 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | 2008年8月29日 13:36:09 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vLYULXro9e133x1CMPg8xOg+zuRCbKoc/QL/MyqUGg0=; b=SvZBKh0CMGkVuGaUvDFW8zhkJ6evyY3jJn7vypf/1jlHCzs2ajyuoTec2Qun8nl0X9 TvvvXKi32sbr8wNhP14yI6PDXDwLgGwDAt7uNEH6t522e28k3g/RSG4/TzkeA5GaVCBY 8HqA6rtCSj/ENK99AHAHGbPVBADJ2mrRJclS8= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=wJOkIyqaFofpO2Zbe9QQT+iWQy3+fPFFPZdORl4o5iwfp2YKMXaDJ8GA9JcEkPhGLT VUiziG6cSkrMsowRrpRzRwbGcGVU29g0caoluLWl9vdHoRoANzTrYXcBhhA0fymEBVi2 qv2/wtAjQfZC0Zmrz7HhwFxMSrdS2u3v96vAo= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C4DE075C.1CA35%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <5d649bdb0808291144s2bd4faf7t545c691175da1829@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4DE075C.1CA35%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Could you show me the changeset number of this? Thanks, Neo On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I applied the patches posted here a couple of days ago. I don't know > whether Ian Jackson has applied the ioemu-remote portion. > > -- Keir > > On 29/8/08 19:44, "Neo Jia" <neojia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> hi, >> >> I just tried the tip of the xen-unstable branch. It looks that the Xen >> supports 64bit BARs now? >> >> Thanks, >> Neo > > > -- I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious probably today we haven't the technology we are using! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] sub-page anonymous domain memory allocator , Daniel Magenheimer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? , Neo Jia |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? , Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? , Neo Jia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |