| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? |
| From: | "Neo Jia" <neojia@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2008年8月29日 11:44:06 -0700 |
| Delivery-date: | 2008年8月29日 11:44:28 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=LxrCs81UalGFRpyqK3IHTWiWdvbCReQYk46prplPS3w=; b=BGEhd8HNnaZQyviXAPbmXiIgyeBuw/TrlxFp1lBmj1JcLoYJmzis/OdN3FO7alB5Dw G5f3+b4rlMn9fub9ZCRwSQzwqm87ibhsMy4KiCbtZEo6oAimyAyBeQ7K7hKhHnQENlzM th24GCEBi2clRK8FoO9kuFjqrebUuMDUjC59w= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lfWSfbTjIr47AzM4ihPXcVEepPKpnl5VA+18TG1adhsQngAFNDYmie/ogqxLiSB05P gMzAFSWIIYMHQszW2RCcDe1aK0AYBhfG3N6GW9KFOgTGZulT4zcAXmLNRLR4X8iC1UTn n+YyXPduXHpcWYHlaG/522HHHpAFPFDkHva1k= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
hi, I just tried the tip of the xen-unstable branch. It looks that the Xen supports 64bit BARs now? Thanks, Neo -- I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious probably today we haven't the technology we are using! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] sub-page anonymous domain memory allocator , Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? , Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] sub-page anonymous domain memory allocator , Daniel Magenheimer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] VT-d on Xen is supporting 64bit BARs? , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |