WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年3月20日 10:22:17 +0000
Delivery-date: 2007年3月20日 03:21:28 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070320044625.GA17463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acdq2aJ+4UeWBdbMEduzOgAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
On 20/3/07 04:46, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> These two patches remove the need for netloop by performing the
> copying in netback and only if it is necessary. The rationale
> is that most packets will be processed without delay allowing
> them to be freed without copying at all. So instead of copying
> every packet destined to dom0 we'll only copy those that linger
> longer than a specified amount of time (currently 0.5s).
One other thought I had -- does the Linux network stack ever modify date
residing outside the main skbuff data area (i.e., data in fragments)? If it
ever does, wouldn't your delayed copy in netback potentially race such
updates? If the Linux network stack guarantees never to do such a thing,
that would be nice for us. :-)
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Herbert Xu
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Keir Fraser
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /