WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年3月20日 10:18:54 +0000
Cc: Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2007年3月20日 03:18:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070320101140.GA19380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acdq2Sl/aBo/StbMEduzOgAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
On 20/3/07 10:11, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes that's a good idea and would avoid the grant table addition.
>
> My only concern would be future acceptance into the mainstream
> Linux kernel, especially on the domU side since I'd like to see
> this idea used for dom0 => domU as well.
>
> However, I'm certainly happy to explore doing it in the way you
> suggested.
That's quite a valid concern, but I think that the required addition to the
#PF handler (certainly for i386 and x86/64) will be clean and small, and it
will not affect #PF critical-path latencies. I'd be fairly optimistic about
it getting accepted upstream, perhaps modulo concerns over whether we'd need
to implement it for *every* architecture.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Question about reserving one CPU for the Xen hypervisor in case of vm exit. , Petersson, Mats
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Herbert Xu
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: [0/2] Remove netloop by lazy copying in netback , Herbert Xu
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /