WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 27/33] Add the Xen virtual console driver.

To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 27/33] Add the Xen virtual console driver.
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年7月18日 11:31:42 +0100
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年7月18日 03:32:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1153218278.3038.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060718091807.467468000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060718091956.653901000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1153218278.3038.43.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 18 Jul 2006, at 11:24, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
hmm somehow I find this code scary; we had similar code recently
elsewhere where this turned out to be a real issue; you now sleep for
"1" time, so you sleep for a fixed time if you aren't getting wakeups,
but if you are getting wakeups your code is upside down, I would expect
it to look like
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ while (DRV(tty->driver)->chars_in_buffer(tty))
+ schedule_timeout(1);
+ if (signal_pending(current))
+ break;
+ if (timeout && time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + timeout))
+ break;
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ }
instead, so that you don't have the wakeup race..
There's no wakeup signal, so no possibility of a wakeup race. That's why we schedule_timeout() instead of wait_event() or similar. This code is only used to flush the console when the kernel crashes, so we can get the full oops, so waiting a little bit too long is acceptable. Your suggested change is perhaps more idiomatic though, and less jarring for reviewers. :-) Thanks for your comments by the way. Reviewing lots of patches isn't much fun.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 18/33] Subarch support for CPUID instruction , Keir Fraser
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device driver. , Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 27/33] Add the Xen virtual console driver. , Arjan van de Ven
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 27/33] Add the Xen virtual console driver. , Hollis Blanchard
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /