WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: DOM0_DOMAIN_SET

To: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月19日 15:45:33 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年6月19日 07:45:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200606191643.55983.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200606151019.24560.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx> <1150726956.5331.3.camel@lappy > <076c5bfb089c4cc5bbe7ea6cf4be559b@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200606191643.55983.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 19 Jun 2006, at 15:43, Tristan Gingold wrote:
I'd like the patch modified as follows:
 * Change flag name to XEN_DOMAINSETUP_hvm_guest (explicitly in Xen
namespace; more the style of other flags added recently; not VMX
specific).
 * Place the final two fields of the struct inside ifdef __ia64__.
Why not defining an arch-dependant struct for adding more fields to this structure ? (I prefer to do that early than breaking compatibility later).
How does that ease binary compatibility if you want to add extra common fields later? You mean to have a pointer to the arch-dep struct?
 -- Keir
PS. The flag name: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP_ would actually be a fine prefix for flags. Use whatever you prefer.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP , Tristan Gingold
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report 10358:73c73fb8875c , Zheng, Jeff
Previous by Thread: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP , Tristan Gingold
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] PATCH: was Re**2: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP , Tristan Gingold
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /