WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken
From: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@xxxxxx>
Date: 2004年10月30日 13:52:08 +0300
Cache-post-path: aka.i.naked.iki.fi!unknown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cancel-lock: sha1:pvi6s0ty1vjk1WFUM2qxbUXd++Y=
Delivery-date: 2004年10月30日 11:55:04 +0100
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie
References: <87is94fh2q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098418544.32097.136.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <877jpjdj6q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098538551.32097.201.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871xfpczo9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098540624.32097.229.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87u0slbj69.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1098547866.32097.250.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410291357130.1271@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux)
Adam Heath wrote:
> On 2004年10月23日, Brian Wolfe wrote:
>
>> *nod* I can see your point about the bootloader issue. Maybe I can
>> set a pre-install debconf question that asks where the admin wants
>> to stuff em, standard location, or host server location
>> (/usr/lib/xen or /usr/lib/kernels or something)
>
> Er, bad. If you have install-time placement of files, then dpkg -S
> doesn't work right.
I understood this completely differently - I thought this pre-install
debconf question to be for the xen linux builder package. But now that
I think about it more, that would be silly, since it could just as
well be put as a question while building the kernel.
-- Naked
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] xen Makefile being nasty with EXTRAVERSION , Adam Heath
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken , Nuutti Kotivuori
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken , Adam Heath
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Unofficial Xen 2.0 debian packages kinda broken , Adam Heath
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /