On Friday 22 December 2006 10:51, Jan Beulich wrote: > If this was with -Wconst-qual, yes. But didn't we agree that at least for > now we'll not add that warning (and hence we also don't absolutely have to > change code only affected by it)? Jan So far I understood, we agreed to not add the flag and not to add the __UNCONST() hack. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag) , Christoph Egger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] FW: Xen 3.0.4 released! , Henning Sprang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag) , Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add -Wcast-qual flag) , Christoph Egger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |