If this was with -Wconst-qual, yes. But didn't we agree that at least for now 
we'll
not add that warning (and hence we also don't absolutely have to change code
only affected by it)? Jan
>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 22.12.06 10:40 >>>
Maybe we need a CONST_ADDR macro, as I suspect the problem is the cast
hidden inside the ADDR macro is dropping the const qualifier.
 -- Keir
On 22/12/06 9:31 am, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I object to the change to variable_test_bit() - why is that needed? I had
> specifically
> submitted a patch to get the const qualifier added there. Jan
>
>>>> "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> 22.12.06 10:05 >>>
>
> Hi!
>
> I catched two pieces with debug and crash_debug enabled.
> One of them fixes a build error even without the -Wcast-qual flag.
>
> Patch attached.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel