[DXBase] Long Outstanding QSLs
Art Searle
[email protected]
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:42:08 -0500
Hi Joe,
Yes. Bacislly that's what I did using a filter:
CDXCC=3D"No" and CFM=3D"Yes"
To bad their isn't a "Not valid for DXCC" box in the QSO filters in the
selection wizard.
73,
Art
W2NRA
Art Searle, Treasurer
Three Village Central School District
My new phone number is (631) 730-4084
Please make a note of it.
[email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Glockner [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:59 AM
> To: Art Searle
> Cc: 'DXBase List'
> Subject: Re: [DXBase] Long Outstanding QSLs
>=20
> Art,
>=20
> You might be able to write another report which also
> checks for
>=20
> CFMTYPE=3D"LOTW" and not valid for DXCC
>=20
> That way - once you enter the fact that the QSO was confirmed
> via LOTW -- and of course, you still have the not valid for DXCC
> there -- that report shud pick-up just those entries that match.
>=20
>=20
> 73 Joe wa6axe
>=20
>=20
> Art Searle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How are you suppose to handle long outstanding QSL.
> >
> > For example it would be silly to keep counting a 40 meter QSO from =
10
years
> > ago toward your 100 worked for that band. What I do is mark all the =
old
> > outstanding QSOs as not valid for DXCC. With LoTW it is now easy to =
get
> > very old QSLs and hard to tell if I marked them not valid for DXCC.
> >
> > I use a report I wrote to check for 'confirmed' and 'not valid for
DXCC'.
> > Is there a better way?
> >
> > Art
> > W2NRA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> >