[Dx-qsl] Cluster-Spot SWLing

Fri Jan 5 15:24:37 EST 2007

Huh?..Pete.....If you hear a station I manage, then there is no reason 
you cant hear the others calls he works as he does say their callsigns.
Before or after is what I need. no other need apply :-)
73
Ron
Graham Ridgeway wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:04:02 -0000, "Pete's-DX-Newsdesk"
> <pete at dx-newsdesk.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> ANTI-VIRUS - This Mail has NO Attachments
>>>> Good Day everyone,
>>>> In reply to Fred's email and his comment:
>> "I wonder what the ISWL thinks about this sort of thing!"
>>>>>>>> As I say, I do not consider this practice to be widespread. I do believe that 
>> the vast majority of SWL's around the world, are honest in what they log and 
>> they do take their hobby seriously.
>>>>>> Well, while it might not be 'widespread' [define] it happens. I
> require two or more 'hearings' not always consecutive ones - and that
> is made clear on qrz.
>> When I was a listener back in the 60's that was something I always did
> as a matter of course.
>> The same is requested by Bob Treacher [now he IS a good SWL !!] for
> the calls he handles - in fact he has a black list, and I know that
> Andreas would never submit a 'duff' report.
>> While the cluster is a valuable tool for many - it is too often used
> to 'abuse'.
>> Keep smiling
>>> 73 Graham M5AAV
>> &quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've got...till it's gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but also true about QSL.NET if more users don't open their wallets and help financially. Please contribute TODAY !!
>>> .
>>