[Dx-qsl] Cluster-Spot SWLing
Graham Ridgeway
m5aav at btinternet.com
Fri Jan 5 13:06:30 EST 2007
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:04:02 -0000, "Pete's-DX-Newsdesk"
<pete at dx-newsdesk.co.uk> wrote:
>ANTI-VIRUS - This Mail has NO Attachments
>>Good Day everyone,
>>In reply to Fred's email and his comment:
>"I wonder what the ISWL thinks about this sort of thing!"
>
>As I say, I do not consider this practice to be widespread. I do believe that
>the vast majority of SWL's around the world, are honest in what they log and
>they do take their hobby seriously.
>
Well, while it might not be 'widespread' [define] it happens. I
require two or more 'hearings' not always consecutive ones - and that
is made clear on qrz.
When I was a listener back in the 60's that was something I always did
as a matter of course.
The same is requested by Bob Treacher [now he IS a good SWL !!] for
the calls he handles - in fact he has a black list, and I know that
Andreas would never submit a 'duff' report.
While the cluster is a valuable tool for many - it is too often used
to 'abuse'.
Keep smiling
73 Graham M5AAV
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list