[Dx-qsl] Re: QSLing

Jeff Stai WK6I [email protected]
Tue May 21 15:41:01 2002


fabulous post, Ron - you should really write it up as an article for one of the mags!
I have added a few comments...
At 09:01 AM 5/21/2002, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
>Scott,
>>Well, I'll answer your question as best I can. I'm also going to copy this
>over to the DX QSL reflector so that people who are more experienced at
>successful QSL'ing can also throw their 2 IRC's worth into it too.
>>How to Succeed in QSL'ing:
>>1. Learn patience. Cards do not return overnight. Expect a minimum of
>10 days for domestic cards and 4 weeks for overseas cards. In the cases of
>a major DXpedition, expect months for a return, since most of the time (and
>there are exceptions) cards are not printed until after the DXpedition
>returns and the managers literally have tens of thousands of QSL requests to
>check through.

Speaking as a procrastinator myself (I'd be a Registered Procrastinator, but 
I never get around to filing the papework) - allow a year. Even minor 
DXpeditions have printing delays - and answering all those cards can take a 
long time!
>...
>2c. Learn where the Internet search engines for QSL information are and use
>them. But keep in mind that sometimes the wrong information or out of date
>information gets listed even in the best of them.

I file all messages from this reflector into a folder and search the folder 
with my email program - that often nets me a working route.
>3. Make sure the DX station has your call correct, which can sometimes be
>difficult in a big pileup. It's been suggested that if you are in doubt,
>log the calls of the stations worked before and after you so that you have
>some "proof" you made the Q & the call in the log is busted.

Never complete the exchange until you hear your whole call repeated back to 
you correctly - it may make you sound like a newby or something, but it gets 
you in the log!
>...
>4. Use "security" envelopes, even domestically. Or wrap the contents of
>the envelope in a thin blank sheet of paper. Or both. Cuts down on
>potential theft, and the sheet of paper "smooths" the envelope out a little
>so that there's less chance of postal machinery snagging on and destroying
>an envelope.

Security envelopes, absolutely. I use a heavy sheet (normal 'copier' paper) 
to smooth it out even more - makes it seem like a multi-page letter.
4a: Use SAEs that fit into your larger envelope without folding - nothing 
sticks out more (literally) than a folded envelope - the folded paper can't 
smooth it out enough, and it can get caught in the machinery.
>5. Minimize use of call letters on the envelope. You're usually OK on
>envelopes going to stations in the US, Canada, and most of Western Europe.
>But the sad fact is that there are way too many areas of the world where
>people handling the envelopes covet cash, and have learned that call letters
>indicate an amateur radio related piece of mail, like a QSL card request
>with dollars and/or IRC's.

This goes for your SAE as well - your request can be a victim of foul play 
on the return leg, too - but help the DX by writing your call in pencil in 
the space where the flap will cover it when sealed.
>5a. Consider having your envelopes printed professionally with a return
>address, or use a good quality laser or ink jet printer to print them on the
>fly. Consider strongly making them look like a professional letter, not a
>personal one. Some people have gone so far as to make them appear to be
>"junk" mail ("congratulations! you may have won 2 IRC's by opening this
>letter!" ... ok, only Ed McMahon could get away with that one)
>>5a1. If you're not going to fake a company name and you're married, use
>your spouse's name (as in "Ron & Julie Notarius" not "Ron Notarius").
>Again, makes it appear to be something other than an a QSL request.
>>5c. Use your home printer to print the mailing address right on the
>envelope. Hand written addresses do not look professional. Mailing labels
>sometimes look like junk mail, but do not look professional.

Here's where I differ - all my "stealth" requests go out handwritten in 
fountain pen, both DX address and my return address. My return address I 
write like this:
STAI
POB 567
PLACENTIA 92870 USA
Both addresses are written in capital block letters. I dunno what difference 
the fountain pen might make, other than I consider it 'lucky', and you don't 
see that scratchy style much any more. (And there are so few opportunities 
to use a fountain pen these days ;-)
My card and green stamp(s) go into the SAE, I wrap the SAE in the paper, 
then stuff it into the larger envelope and stamp it with a plain 80 cent stamp.
By the time I am done it just looks like a letter to the folks back home. 
With this method, I have a better than 90% return rate on all-time new 
countries (235 worked, 18 not yet confirmed, but 15 of those were mailed in 
2002).
>5d. Tape envelopes shut. Prevents humidity and other factors from
>"accidently" opening sealed envelopes.

Yes, but don't mummify it. I use a simple square of tape at the 'point' of 
the flap.
>...
>7a. Some areas of the world prohibit their citizens to possess US or
>other foreign currency. It is usually a bad idea to send Green Stamps to
>these areas.
>...
>7d. In some areas, a dollar buys more air mail postage than an IRC. In
>other areas, the opposite is true. And some places want more than one IRC
>to cover air mail back to the US. How do you find out? Ask questions on
>one of the many DX & QSL reflectors. Also check out the fine IRC chart that
>Bill W9OL has put together at
>http://www.qsl.net/w9ol/ircchart.txt

For a new one, I will always send an extra dollar - it is worth it to me to 
ensure that postage and costs are really covered. I just do without a 
Snicker bar that day...;-)
Sometimes I will send 5ドル to small DXpeditions that I have made a couple 
contacts with, and more to the big ones. They have worked really hard to 
give me a lot of fun, so why not?
>10. Reality is that there are some DX that either have most of their mail
>intercepted or are IRC/GS collectors. So don't be afraid to ask first.
>But don't be disappointed if some of these never come through, or if they
>reply years later through the bureau. Some have reasons; they might be good
>ones (which is no excuse, though). Some are just... what they are.

10a: If the DX sends you your card, and a few cards for some other hams, 
just forward them along. Be happy that you have been able to help a fellow ham.
>14. Don't give up. Things happen. It took me 12 years, for example, but I
>finally tracked down and got my EL7X card -- the original request had been
>lost during civil disturbances, and it was a long time until I found that
>the amateur had escaped and was still alive AND still had his logs. Some
>Silent Key logs are lost, but others are put in manager's hands and cards
>can still be obtained. ASK if in doubt.
>>15. Patience!

yes, and listening!-)
>Some things that I know others do that I don't:
>>1. I have hardly ever bothered with the flimsy light-weight air mail
>envelopes. They made sense when air mail was weighed by the 1/2 ounce, but
>not by the ounce. And sometimes the cost of buying the envelopes and
>handling them is more than the cost of postage. Those who swear by them
>will no doubt disagree with me on that!

Me either - but it may be something I will try on a resend. I have noticed 
some DX will discard my SAE and reply with the flimsy. I am thankful they 
were willing to do this, but sad that they had to take the extra time...
Anyway Ron - fabulous, like I said - and hope my comments are helpful.
73 and GL - jeff wk6i
Jeff Stai Twisted Oak Winery LLC
Email [email protected]
Amateur Radio WK6I
ROC Web Page http://www.rocstock.org/

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /