Am 24.02.25 um 20:42 schrieb John Klos:
So why is it we can't not get vim thinking it depends on two versions of vim-share after all these years? I haven't been able to figure it out.The thing is, vim depends on the exact same version of vim-share. So you cannot update one without updating the other. If our package tools were a bit smarter, they would deal with that properly -- if you do a single transaction updating both, that should be fine.
-- Benny