Re: LuaChip and GC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: LuaChip and GC
• From: Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>
• Date: 2004年8月11日 16:20:48 +0300

---

Does that imply that more cpu cycles would be needed than in current Lua GC implementation? Remember, in portable devices that means battery life so I'd be personally inclined to the existing solution.

-ak
11.8.2004 kello 13:00, Michael T. Richter kirjoitti:

 Ideally it runs as a
low-priority task (which could cause a problem if you have a lot of

high-priority tasks gobbling memory, of course) and collects garbage a cell

at a time as long as nothing more important is running.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: LuaChip and GC, Michael T. Richter

• References:
  • LuaChip - The Project So Far, Erik Hougaard
  • Re: LuaChip - The Project So Far, Asko Kauppi
  • Re: LuaChip - The Project So Far, Erik Hougaard
  • Re: LuaChip - The Project So Far, Asko Kauppi
  • LuaChip and GC, Michael T. Richter
  • Re: LuaChip and GC, Rici Lake
  • Re: LuaChip and GC, Michael T. Richter

• Prev by Date: Re: C API question - modifing table
• Next by Date: Re: LuaChip - The Project So Far
• Previous by thread: Re: LuaChip and GC
• Next by thread: Re: LuaChip and GC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread