Interacting Particle Systems
Last update: 07 Jul 2025 13:33
First version: 16 February 2006, major expansion 29 September 2007
In the obvious sense, all of statistical
mechanics is about "interacting particle systems". More technically,
however, the name has come to refer to a class
of spatio-temporal stochastic
processes, in which time is continuous, space may or may not be discrete,
and each spatial location can be in one of a discrete number of states ---
interpreted as the number or type of particles at that point-instant. The
global configuration evolves according to a Markov
process. These are natural generalizations
of cellular automata to continuous time,
which raises some interesting mathematical issues, and adds a little more
realism.
Standard CA update all cells synchronously, but changing this updating
scheme can change the qualitative behavior of a rule considerably.
(Fates and Morvan have a
nice paper on this, with a review of the published literature on the question,
which is a small slice of the unpublished folklore.) Query: When
synchronous and asynchronous updating in a discrete-time CA give very different
behaviors, which one matches the continuous-time interacting particle system?
This sounds like a question which could be resolved through
the usual Kurtz et
al. machinery for proving that a sequence of Markov processes converge by
manipulating their generators.
Particle filtering from state estimation goes
here. The idea in that case is to represent possible hidden states of the
system through a large but finite number of particles, located in the state
space. In between observations, particles move independently, in accordance
with the dynamics your model assumes on the state space. When observations are
made, particles get re-sampled, with weights proportional to the likelihood of
getting the current observation from the represented state. Particles at
different locations (states) thus interact with each other through the
population-averaged likelihood, rather than through the local interactions
typical of physical models. Many people have noticed that this sounds like
evolution, or at least
a genetic algorithm....
Recommended:
- P. Del Moral and L. Miclo, "Branching and Interacting Particle
Systems Approximations of Feynman-Kac Formulae with Applications to Nonlinear
Filtering", in Jacques Azéma, Michel Émery, Michel Ledoux and Marc Yor (eds)., Séminaire de
Probabilités XXXIV (Springer-Verlag, 2003),
pp. 1--145 [Postscript
preprint. Looks like a trial run for Del Moral's book.]
- Rick Durrett
- Bert Fristedt and Lawrence Gray, A Modern Approach to
Probability Theory [Contains a good one-chapter account of the basics of
interacting particle systems, but presumes knowledge of measure-theoretic
probability and stochastic
processes --- such as you'd get from reading the earlier chapters!]
- David Griffeath, Additive and Cancellative Interacting
Particle Systems
To read:
- David Aldous, "Interacting particle systems as stochastic social dynamics", Bernoulli 19 (2013): 1122--1149
- E. Andjel, G. Maillard, T.S. Mountford, "A note on 'signed voter
models'", arxiv:0709.3468
- Alexei Andreanov, Giulio Biroli, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, and
Alexandre Lefevre, "Field theories and exact stochastic equations for
interacting particle
systems", Physical Review E 74 (2006): 030101, cond-mat/0602307
- Chalee Asavathiratham, The influence model: a tractable representation for the dynamics of networked Markov chains
- Sven Banisch, Ricardo Lima, Tanya Araújo, "Agent Based Models and Opinion Dynamics as Markov Chains", arxiv:1108.1716
- Lamia Belhadji, "Ergodicity and hydrodynamic limits for an epidemic model", arxiv:0710.5185
- Vivek Borkar, Rajesh Sundaresan, "Asymptotics of the Invariant Measure in Mean Field Models with Jumps", arxiv:1107.4142
- Anne-Severine Boudou, Pietro Caputo, Paolo Dai Pra and Gustavo
Posta, "Spectral gap estimates for interacting particle systems via a Bakry &
Emery-type approach", math.PR/0505533
- Clive G. Bowsher, "Stochastic kinetic models: Dynamic independence,
modularity and graphs", Annals of Statistics 38 (2010): 2242--2281
- Xavier Bressaud and Nicolas Fournier, "On the invariant distribution
of a one-dimensional avalanche
process", math.PR/0703750
- Amarjit Budhiraja, Paul Dupuis, Markus Fischer, "Large deviation properties of weakly interacting processes via weak convergence methods", Annals of Probability 40 (2012): 74--102, arxiv:1009.6030
- Nicoletta Cancrini, Fabio Martinelli, Cyril Roberto, Cristina
Toninelli, "Facilitated spin models: recent and new
results", arxiv:0712.1934
- Sebastien Chambeu and Aline Kurtzmann, "Some particular self-interacting diffusions: Ergodic behaviour and almost sure convergence", Bernoulli 17 (2011): 1348--1267
- Chan, From Markov Chains to Non-Equilibrium Particle
Systems
- Leonardo Crochik and Tania Tome, "Entropy production in the
majority-vote model", Physical
Review E 72 (2005): 057103
- D. A. Dawson (ed.), Measure-Valued Processes, Stochastic
Partial Differential Equations, and Interacting Systems
- Pierre Del Moral
- Pierre Del Moral and Arnaud Doucet, "Interacting Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for solving nonlinear measure-valued equations", Annals of Applied Probability 20 (2010): 593--639
- Pierre Del Moral and Josselin Garnier, "Genealogical particle analysis of rare events", Annals of Applied Probability 15 (2005): 2496--2534, arxiv:math/0602525
- Pierre Del Moral, Peng Hu and Liming Wu, "On the Concentration Properties of Interacting Particle Processes", Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 3 (2012): 225--389, arxiv:1107.1948
- Paul Doukhan, Gabriel Lang, Sana Louhichi, Bernard Ycart, "A
functional central limit theorem for interacting particle systems on transitive
graphs", math-ph/0509041
- Richard Durrett
- Andreas Eibeck and Wolfgang Wagner, "Stochastic Interacting
Particle Systems and Nonlinear Kinetic
Equations", Annals of
Applied Probability 13 (2003): 845--889
- Alison M. Etheridge, An Introduction to Superprocesses
- Joaquin Fontbona, Helene Guerin, Sylvie Meleard, "Measurability of
optimal transportation and convergence rate for Landau type interacting
particle
systems", math.PR/0703432
- Henryk Fuks and Nino Boccara, "Convergence to equilibrium in a
class of interacting particle systems evolving in discrete time," nlin.CG/0101037
- A. Galves, E. Löcherbach and E. Orlandi, "Perfect Simulation of Infinite Range Gibbs Measures and Coupling with Their Finite Range Approximations", Journal of Statistical Physics
138 (2010): 476--495
- Maciej Gluchowski and Georg Menz, "Time-Scaling, Ergodicity, and Covariance Decay of Interacting Particle Systems", Journal of Statistical Physics 192 (2025): 6, arxiv:2312.06935
- Thierry Gobron and Ellen Saada, "Coupling, Attractiveness and
Hydrodynamics for Conservative Particle Systems", arxiv:0903.0316
- A. Greven, F. den Hollander, "Phase transitions for the long-time
behaviour of interacting
diffusions", math.PR/0611141
- Malte Henkel, "Ageing, dynamical scaling and its extensions in
many-particle systems without detailed
balance", cond-mat/0609672
- Jane Hillston, a href="http://cambridge.org/9780521571890">A Compositional Approach to Performance Modelling
- Jack D. Hywood, Emily J. Hackett-Jones, and Kerry A. Landman, "Modeling biological tissue growth: Discrete to continuum representations", Physical Review E 88 (2013): 032704
- Benedikt Jahnel & Jonas Köppl, "Trajectorial Dissipation of \( \Phi \)-Entropies for Interacting Particle Systems", Journal of Statistical Physics 190 (2023): 119
- Vassili N. Kolokoltsov, "Nonlinear Markov Semigroups and
Interacting Lévy Type
Processes", Journal
of Statistical Physics 126 (2007): 585-642
- Nicholas Lanicher, "The Axelrod model for the dissemination of culture revisited", Annals of Applied Probability 22 (2012): 860--880
- Julio Largo, Piero Tartaglia, Francesco Sciortino, "Effective
non-additive pair potential for lock-and-key interacting particles: the role of
the limited
valence", cond-mat/0703383
- Alexandre Lefevre, Giulio Biroli, "Dynamics of interacting particle
systems: stochastic process and field
theory", arxiv:0709.1325
- Thomas M. Liggett
- E. Locherbach, "Likelihood Ratio Processes for Markovian Particle
Systems with Killing and Jumps", Statistical Inference for Stochastic
Processes 5 (2002): 153--177
- Nadia Loy, Andrea Tosin, "Markov jump processes and collision-like models in the kinetic description of multi-agent systems",
Communications in Mathematical Sciences 18 (2020): 1539--1568, arxiv:1905.11343
- Frank Redig, Florian Völlering, "Concentration of Additive Functionals for Markov Processes and Applications to Interacting Particle Systems", arxiv:1003.0006
- Daniel Remenik, "Limit Theorems for Individual-Based Models in
Economics and
Finance", arxiv:0810.2813
- David Schnoerr, Ramon Grima, Guido Sanguinetti, "Cox process representation and inference for stochastic reaction-diffusion processes",
Nature Communications 7 (2016): 11729, arxiv:1601.01972
- A. V. Skorohod, Stochastic Equations for Complex
Systems [chapter 2 being "Randomly Interacting Systems of Particles"]
- Anja Sturm and Jan Swart, "Voter models with heterozygosity
selection", math.PR/0701555
- Denis Villemonais, "Interacting particle systems and Yaglom limit approximation of diffusions with unbounded drift", arxiv:1005.1530
- Biao Wu, "Interacting Agent Feedback Finance Model",
math.PR/0703827