The following questions should not be closed or deleted:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/311899/find-availability-software-architecture What's the equation to use for finding availability in software architecture? - Although it appears to be a homework question, but the asker did show the work. The answer is also reasonably well explained. Perhaps there should be some edits to the question (specifically the title) and the tags, but there's not really a problem here.
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/311866/connected-city-problem https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/311866/connected-city-problem - This question should probably be closed, but not deleted. There is some cross-posting, but if the asker better explains the algorithm that is being used, I don't see how it's not on-topic. It should remain closed as unclear, but there are no comments prompting for what is truly needed to help this person work through their problem.
The rest don't appear to be good. I don't agree with the close reason on all of them. For example, this question this question should probably be closed as a recommendation question and not unclear. But they should all be closed and on some path to deletion, either roomba or VtD.
A theme that I'm seeing is that "unclear what you're asking" is used for questions that seem to be "do my work for me" questions. There's really no better close option that fits, but it's something to keep in mind. It's not that the question isn't clear. We fully understand that you want us to give you answers, but that isn't how it works here.
The following questions should not be closed or deleted:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/311899/find-availability-software-architecture - Although it appears to be a homework question, but the asker did show the work. The answer is also reasonably well explained. Perhaps there should be some edits to the question (specifically the title) and the tags, but there's not really a problem here.
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/311866/connected-city-problem - This question should probably be closed, but not deleted. There is some cross-posting, but if the asker better explains the algorithm that is being used, I don't see how it's not on-topic. It should remain closed as unclear, but there are no comments prompting for what is truly needed to help this person work through their problem.
The rest don't appear to be good. I don't agree with the close reason on all of them. For example, this question should probably be closed as a recommendation question and not unclear. But they should all be closed and on some path to deletion, either roomba or VtD.
A theme that I'm seeing is that "unclear what you're asking" is used for questions that seem to be "do my work for me" questions. There's really no better close option that fits, but it's something to keep in mind. It's not that the question isn't clear. We fully understand that you want us to give you answers, but that isn't how it works here.
The following questions should not be closed or deleted:
What's the equation to use for finding availability in software architecture? - Although it appears to be a homework question, but the asker did show the work. The answer is also reasonably well explained. Perhaps there should be some edits to the question (specifically the title) and the tags, but there's not really a problem here.
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/311866/connected-city-problem - This question should probably be closed, but not deleted. There is some cross-posting, but if the asker better explains the algorithm that is being used, I don't see how it's not on-topic. It should remain closed as unclear, but there are no comments prompting for what is truly needed to help this person work through their problem.
The rest don't appear to be good. I don't agree with the close reason on all of them. For example, this question should probably be closed as a recommendation question and not unclear. But they should all be closed and on some path to deletion, either roomba or VtD.
A theme that I'm seeing is that "unclear what you're asking" is used for questions that seem to be "do my work for me" questions. There's really no better close option that fits, but it's something to keep in mind. It's not that the question isn't clear. We fully understand that you want us to give you answers, but that isn't how it works here.
The following questions should not be closed or deleted:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/311899/find-availability-software-architecture - Although it appears to be a homework question, but the asker did show the work. The answer is also reasonably well explained. Perhaps there should be some edits to the question (specifically the title) and the tags, but there's not really a problem here.
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/311866/connected-city-problem - This question should probably be closed, but not deleted. There is some cross-posting, but if the asker better explains the algorithm that is being used, I don't see how it's not on-topic. It should remain closed as unclear, but there are no comments prompting for what is truly needed to help this person work through their problem.
The rest don't appear to be good. I don't agree with the close reason on all of them. For example, this question should probably be closed as a recommendation question and not unclear. But they should all be closed and on some path to deletion, either roomba or VtD.
A theme that I'm seeing is that "unclear what you're asking" is used for questions that seem to be "do my work for me" questions. There's really no better close option that fits, but it's something to keep in mind. It's not that the question isn't clear. We fully understand that you want us to give you answers, but that isn't how it works here.