Timeline for Is Stack Exchange's CC-BY-SA v3.0 content compatible with the GPL?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:31 | history | edited | Community Bot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 26, 2018 at 19:44 | answer | added | Trevor | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 24, 2016 at 12:36 | comment | added | Zizouz212 | Leaving open again since I think this question is focused on a particular clause of the license, and how it affects compatibility with the GPL. I discourage duplicates even if questions are similar, because they make a site more like a general help center for questions, and don't foster specific questions to be asked. | |
| Jun 24, 2016 at 5:02 | comment | added | Tim Malone | @NicolasRaoul Similar to my comment on the other potential duplicate - unfortunately the answers on this target are incorrect. I do agree we need to work out how to combine everything though! | |
| Jun 24, 2016 at 3:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 24, 2016 at 12:36 | |||||
| Jun 24, 2016 at 3:29 | comment | added | Nicolas Raoul | Possible duplicate of Can I copy-paste a snippet from StackOverflow into my GNU-GPL project? | |
| Dec 18, 2015 at 0:15 | history | edited | user756 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correct to the correct annoying license.
|
| Dec 18, 2015 at 0:14 | comment | added | user756 | @congusbongus Thank you for correcting me. I meant the original one | |
| Dec 18, 2015 at 0:12 | comment | added | congusbongus | BSD 3-clause is GPL compatible. | |
| Dec 17, 2015 at 17:34 | comment | added | unor | Note that the quoted attribution requirements are not sufficient; SE’s blog post is missing the requirement to reference the license. | |
| Dec 17, 2015 at 17:26 | answer | added | unor | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 17, 2015 at 16:58 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 17, 2015 at 17:47 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2015 at 16:57 | history | asked | user756 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |