As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peers should generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You're destroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peers should generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You're destroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peers should generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You're destroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here post here, and answer here answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peers should generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You're destroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peers should generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You're destroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peers should generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You're destroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peersshould generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You'redestroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peersshould generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You'redestroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.
As per Jeff's post here, and answer here:
Questions which contain useful content contributed by your peersshould generally be merged, not deleted.
I wish people wouldn't delete questions with good answers. You'redestroying the useful contributions of your peers!
It's all about usefulness. Many questions get closed, but have useful answers that we want to preserve. Deletion votes should be based on usefulness, and that means usefulness to somebody, not just because it doesn't apply to your individual programming needs.
If a question is useful, but fits one of the close reasons, and has no potential for really useful answers, then it should be locked.