[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: gnustep-make experiment
From:
Nicola Pero
Subject:
Re: gnustep-make experiment
Date:
2007年2月13日 06:07:04 +0100 (CET)
>> Because we don't even store fixed sets of flags, but we compute them
>> dynamically,
>> using pkg-config to print them is more of an additional problem
>> than a solution.
>
> I forget exactly how non-flattend looks having not used it since the
> default changed...
>
> but heres an example of a dynamic -L for a specific architecture
>
> $ pkg-config --define-variable=host_os=linux-gnu
> --define-variable=host_cpu=ix86 --libs-only-L gnustep
> -L/System/Library/Libraries/linux-gnu/ix86
> -L/Local/Library/Libraries/linux-gnu/ix86
>
> because it is only a file, is a benefit because it forces you to keep
> your logic separated from all the flags.
I think I'm wasting my time answering this question. Is it even a question ?
Where exactly would we be using pkg-config ? Put forward a proposal and we
discuss.
It seems you're just trying to prove that pkg-config can print out some text
from
a text file, replacing variables. Who cares ? Why is it relevant ?
Compile/link flags can be just anything on different machines. Try
gnustep-make
on different machines (Windows cygwin/mingw32, Apple, Linux, Solaris, *BSD,
etc)
and you'll see completely different flags.
Thanks
PS: And you're missing my all important
-L/home/nicola/GNUstep-test-4/Library/Libraries
flag that is required to find my locally hacked Renaissance.
Re: gnustep-make experiment,
Nicola Pero <=
Re: gnustep-make experiment , Gregory John Casamento, 2007年02月13日
Re: gnustep-make experiment , Nicola Pero, 2007年02月13日
Re: gnustep-make experiment , Gregory John Casamento, 2007年02月15日
Re: gnustep-make experiment , Nicola Pero, 2007年02月16日
Re: gnustep-make experiment , Nicola Pero, 2007年02月16日