[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch
From:
Pascal Bourguignon
Subject:
Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch
Date:
2002年6月28日 01:21:24 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Chris B.Vetter <chrisv@web4inc.com>
> Date: 2002年6月27日 11:06:41 -0700
>
> On 2002年6月27日 19:25:28 +0200
> Marcus M端ller <znek@mulle-kybernetik.com> wrote:
> > > Both, actually, if not quite up-to-date... (haven't tested Sol9 yet)
> > Same here (Sol 8).
>
> That's what I'm using ;-)
>
> > >> Objections anyone ? Is such an approach going to make someone unhappy ?
> > > Certainly not me.
> > Nope. But what exactly would you replace #!/bin/sh in the GNUstep
> > scripts with? A current FreeBSD still ships with:
>
> No need, if you use zsh. Using 'emulate csh' you could use zsh to,
> well, emulate csh behaviour (see 'man zshall').
>
> I don't think it's possible to write one script that can be interpreted
> by every shell variant, but since /bin/sh exist on every system...
Yes, it's easy enough. For example the following file can be run by a
C compiler or interpreter, a Fortran compiler or interpreter, or a sh
or csh interterpreter.
----------(happy.source)-----------------
cat /*dev/null; echo "Happy New Year"\!
cat <<c*/ /*dev/null | cat > /dev/null
c */ () {} /*
c */ main() { cat(); printf("Happy New Year!\n"); } /*
17 format('Happy New Year!')
write (6,17)
stop
end
c*/
-----------(Makefile)-------------------
all: happy-c happy-f happy-sh happy-csh
@ echo -n '(C) '
@ ./happy-c || true
@ echo -n '(FORTRAN) '
@ ./happy-f
@ echo -n '(Bourne Shell) '
@ sh ./happy-sh
@ echo -n '(C Shell) '
@ csh ./happy-csh
happy-c:happy.source Makefile
@ cp happy.source happy-c.c
@ gcc -o happy-c happy-c.c
happy-f:happy.source Makefile
@ cp happy.source happy-f.f
@ f77 -o happy-f happy-f.f 2> /dev/null
happy-sh:happy.source Makefile
@ cp happy.source happy-sh
@ chmod 755 happy-sh
happy-csh:happy.source Makefile
@ cp happy.source happy-csh
@ chmod 755 happy-csh
clean:
-rm -f *.o *~ happy-csh happy-sh happy-f happy-f.f happy-c happy-c.c
----------------------------------------
> The problem would be to find a common denominator, since some
> systems link /bin/sh to /bin/bash, others to /bin/csh or /bin/ksh.
>
> Come to think of, osh(1) probably is the 'purest' shell, implementing
> just the standard commands of UNIX up to edition 7.
> See
> http://omnibus.ruf.uni-freiburg.de/~gritter/man/osh.html
>
> --
> Chris
--
__Pascal_Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002年06月25日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Nicola Pero, 2002年06月25日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Markus Hitter, 2002年06月25日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Nicola Pero, 2002年06月27日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Chris B . Vetter, 2002年06月27日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Marcus M端ller, 2002年06月27日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch , Chris B . Vetter, 2002年06月27日
- Re: GNUstep make Solaris 2.8 glitch,
Pascal Bourguignon <=