Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1

On 2002年06月03日 11:06:40 -0600 Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:

Do you think you could submit a patch which does this? I can put out a new 
release of gnustep-base with this fix, then.

Here it goes. (ugly hack)
I've put a call to a bogus function in NSByteOrder.h, and inserted this 
function in
NSData.m (it was the file I was editing when I found the bug).
It should be #ifdef'd with gcc version 3.1, but I don't know the symbol name to 
test.
Benhur
<NSByteOrder.h.diff><NSData.m.diff>

Attachment: NSByteOrder.h.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: NSData.m.diff
Description: Binary data

• building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1 , Matthias Klose, 2002年06月01日
  • Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1 , Benhur Stein, 2002年06月03日
    • Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1 , Adam Fedor, 2002年06月03日
      • Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1, Benhur Stein <=
      • Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1 , Adam Fedor, 2002年06月04日
    • Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1 , Nicola Pero, 2002年06月06日

• Prev by Date: Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1
• Next by Date: Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1
• Previous by thread: Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1
• Next by thread: Re: building gnustep-base with gcc-3.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread