Re: [PATCH] fs: dlm: Spellings fixed throughout the fle lock.c
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Sat Feb 27 2021 - 19:22:36 EST
On 2/27/21 3:33 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
>
Few spelling fixes throughout the file.
>
in Subject: s/fle/file/
>
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
>
---
>
fs/dlm/lock.c | 10 +++++-----
>
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
>
index 002123efc6b0..efcd84faca14 100644
>
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
>
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
>
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void del_timeout(struct dlm_lkb *lkb);
>
static void toss_rsb(struct kref *kref);
>
>
/*
>
- * Lock compatibilty matrix - thanks Steve
>
+ * Lock compatibility matrix - thanks Steve
>
* UN = Unlocked state. Not really a state, used as a flag
>
* PD = Padding. Used to make the matrix a nice power of two in size
>
* Other states are the same as the VMS DLM.
>
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static int find_rsb_dir(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
>
error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].keep, name, len, &r);
>
if (error)
>
goto do_toss;
>
-
>
+
stray change?
>
/*
>
* rsb is active, so we can't check master_nodeid without lock_rsb.
>
*/
>
@@ -2357,14 +2357,14 @@ static int _can_be_granted(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int now,
>
* 6-5: But the default algorithm for deciding whether to grant or
>
* queue conversion requests does not by itself guarantee that such
>
* requests are serviced on a "first come first serve" basis. This, in
>
- * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinate postponement".
>
+ * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinite postponement".
>
*
>
* 6-7: This issue is dealt with by using the optional QUECVT flag with
>
* the system service employed to request a lock conversion. This flag
>
* forces certain conversion requests to be queued, even if they are
>
* compatible with the granted modes of other locks on the same
>
* resource. Thus, the use of this flag results in conversion requests
>
- * being ordered on a "first come first servce" basis.
>
+ * being ordered on a "first come first serve" basis.
>
*
>
* DCT: This condition is all about new conversions being able to occur
>
* "in place" while the lock remains on the granted queue (assuming
>
@@ -5745,7 +5745,7 @@ int dlm_recover_process_copy(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rcom *rc)
>
>
log_debug(ls, "dlm_recover_process_copy %x remote %d %x %d",
>
lkid, rc->rc_header.h_nodeid, remid, result);
>
-
>
+
stray change?
>
dlm_send_rcom_lock(r, lkb);
>
goto out;
>
case -EEXIST:
>
--
--
~Randy