- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:43:42 -0400
- To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20010905184342.7EDAB87628@policy.w3.org>
DATE AND TIME Monday, 13:00 EST (1pm) 10-Sep-01. Call Tobin bridge (+1-617-252-7000) BACKGROUND The Overview URL for this group is at: http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/ AGENDA Reviewing Previous Acition Items 1. [DEL: Reagle[DEL: : make it a declaration within CipherData using Eastlake's nonce proposal text where necessary. :DEL] :DEL] 2. [DEL: Dillaway[DEL: : tweak section 4.0 to represnt his understanding/proposal of recent discussions. :DEL] :DEL] 3. Schaad: on DigestMethod/DigestValue send proposal for integrity to list within the week with the necessary changes. Action Eastlake: given Schaad's abense, send an email with this proposal. 4. Eastlake: add real life examples in section 5.5 to illustrate. Issues * XML Encryption Processing Model: Are we satisfied with the present text; does it have the right balance of specific detail of encoding and abstraction? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Aug/0031.html * Plaintext Integrity (Redux) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Sep/0010.html * KeyAgreement (keyszie and (pseudo) random number generation) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Aug/0062.html * Should we permit normal public key encryption and not restrict them to key transport? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Sep/0000.html * Do we want a EncryptedProperties? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Aug/0032.html * Add text on the creation of nonce and integrity in the processing rules. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Sep/0002.html
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 14:43:43 UTC