www-rdf-logic@w3.org from October 2000 by date

Wednesday, 1 November 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 31 October 2000

Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Seth Russell
Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Lynn Andrea Stein
Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

Monday, 30 October 2000

RE: names, URIs and ontologies Emery, Pat
names, URIs and ontologies Lynn Andrea Stein
Bound variables Drew McDermott
Re: names, URIs and ontologies jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

Saturday, 28 October 2000

Friday, 27 October 2000

names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: Instance Data Question Mike Dean

Thursday, 26 October 2000

Instance Data Question DaCosta . Ben

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Dan Brickley
Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
RE: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Holmes III, William S

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Dan Connolly
DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Sergey Melnik
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jim Hendler
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Monday, 23 October 2000

RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
Expressing Inference Rules Brown, Lawrence M.
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jim Hendler
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat

Friday, 20 October 2000

RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Hart, Lewis
Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
RE: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Hart, Lewis
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Je'ro^me Euzenat
daml-ont and oil Deborah McGuinness
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Deborah McGuinness

Thursday, 19 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
RE: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Hart, Lewis
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Frank van Harmelen

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat

Thursday, 19 October 2000

Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

Re: Variables in rdf (Re: capturing 'foreall' in a graph picture) Didier Villevalois

Monday, 16 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
complexity of reasoning in DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) pat hayes
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Ian Horrocks
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) pat hayes
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Ian Horrocks
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) pat hayes
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) pat hayes
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) pat hayes
Concrete types Ian Horrocks
Re: status of DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Ian Horrocks
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
status of DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Ian Horrocks
Semantics or not semantics? Ian Horrocks
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Ian Horrocks
Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Ian Horrocks
Assertion -v- inference Ian Horrocks
Relying on RDF(S) semantics Ian Horrocks
Does DAML-ONT extend RDFS? Ian Horrocks
DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat

Sunday, 15 October 2000

Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) Dlmcg1@aol.com
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Dan Connolly
Re: Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) Dan Connolly
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dan Connolly
Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) Frank van Harmelen
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Frank van Harmelen
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Frank van Harmelen
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Frank van Harmelen

Saturday, 14 October 2000

Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Dan Connolly
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 13 October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo Jim Hendler
DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Dan Connolly
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] pat hayes
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Drew McDermott
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Jeff Heflin
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] pat hayes
comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Bill Andersen
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] pat hayes
more DAML-ONT comments jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 12 October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Jeff Heflin
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dan Connolly
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Drew McDermott
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dlmcg1@aol.com
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dan Connolly
basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Dan Connolly
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Dintinguish among ontology, metadata repositories and data dictionary Gann Ketty

Wednesday, 11 October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat Jim Hendler
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat Dan Connolly
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Bill Andersen
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Robert E. Kent
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Jim Hendler
EU Commission: SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES Workshop Hans-Georg Stork
semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Dan Connolly
Assertion by reference [was: Comments on Annotated DAML...] Dan Connolly
Re: Comments on Annotated DAML Ontology Markup, rev 1.6, date 2000年10月07日 Dan Connolly
Comments on Annotated DAML Ontology Markup, rev 1.6, date 2000年10月07日 Grit Denker

Tuesday, 10 October 2000

1st public release - DAML-ONT Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

Re: First pass at DAML/OIL mapping Mike Dean

Monday, 2 October 2000

For review: some DAML thoughts Dan Connolly

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2000 19:00:37 UTC