- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:38:58 +0100
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <20030905093858.6e27bb30.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 02:36:13 +0100 "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote: > Section 3.2 of rdf-testcases [1] states: > > \UHHHHHHHH > 8 required hexadecimal digits HHHHHHHH encoding > character [#x10000-#x10FFFF] > > Which implies that any code point over U+10FFFF cannot be represented > in an N-Triples string, unless encoded as a surrogate block. However, > the test.nt N-Triples test file [2] referenced from rdf-testcases > contains the following literal production instances: > > "\U001FFFFF" # resource18 > "\U03FFFFFF" # resource19 > "\U7FFFFFFF" # resource20 > > Each of which are greater than U+10FFFF. Is the rdf-testcases in > error, or test.nt, or neither? > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ntriples/test.nt The test.nt [2] is in error, pre-dating the previous correction to the working draft to allow only code points up to #x10FFFF (from a comment by I18N). I will fix it shortly. Thanks Dave
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 04:40:45 UTC