- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: 2002年12月12日 23:25:58 +0000
- To: mbatsis@netsmart.gr
- Cc: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, Art.Barstow@nokia.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <12388.1039735558@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>m batsis said: > > On Thursday 12 December 2002 22:55, Frank Manola wrote: > > Art.Barstow@nokia.com wrote: > > > Because http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# > > is the base URI that Section 3 of the XML Schema datatypes spec > > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/) says to use to address them. > > My understanding of section 3.1 "Namespace considerations]" [1] is that > applications other than XSD that wish to point to that spec's datatypes > (without further understanding of XSD) should use the URI suggested by Art > Barstow. As I already noted http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0282.html section 3.1 says "each .built-in. datatype is also defined in the namespace whose URI is http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes" So to identify an XSD datatype you have a namespace URI plus the datatype name "in the namespace" - a pair of items. RDF uses URI-references to identify resources. Section 3 clearly defines the URI-reference for the atomic datatypes, which is what existing RDF, DAML+OIL and soon OWL are using. Dave
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 18:28:08 UTC