Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: 2002年11月21日 19:02:04 -0500 (EST)
• To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20021121.190204.70982033.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

With the indicate change, the caveat would help to reduce the potential for
problems.
peter
From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
Date: 2002年11月21日 23:53:58 +0000
> Peter,
> 
> I believe I have now understood your concerns on equality ...
> 
> Would the following text near the beginning of the abstract syntax section 
> help (help enough to reduce it to a minor concern?)
> [[
> Note: Syntactic equality, between RDF graphs, URI references or literals, 
> is *ALWAYS* inappropriate for applications. Semantic notions, defined in 
> [RDF-SEMANTICS], such as that of entailment between graphs, or that of 
> having the same denotation are to be used instead.
> ]]
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 19:03:34 UTC