- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: 2002年2月13日 10:05:31 +0000
- To: Roland Schwaenzl <roland@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <7705.1013594731@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Roland Schwaenzl said: > somewhere on the web i've seen > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" > xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"> > <rdf:Description> > <dc:subject> > <dcterms:MESH> > <rdf:value>D08.586.682.075.400</rdf:value> > <rdfs:label>Formate Dehydrogenase</rdfs:label> > </dcterms:MESH> > </dc:subject> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > > > I have received a message indicating, that such construction might > become illegal or deprecated in a few weeks by W3C. > Would like some clarification by the WG on this. (I'm not 100% sure, > whether this question is related to the current dataTyping proposals.) As a member of the RDF Core working group, and not speaking for it, I can't see any of the above RDF/XML syntax that is going to be removed from the syntax, or illegal as you put it. However, the interpretation of the syntax may change - especially for rdf:value, since that was rather vaguely defined (by example only) in the RDF Model & Syntax document. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 05:05:43 UTC