- From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- Date: 2009年3月15日 22:10:07 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, vcarddav@ietf.org, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E0B43D80987FE4C8671C2906@socrates.local>
Hi Julian, --On March 12, 2009 3:46:07 PM +0100 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > A few comments with respect to the IANA Considerations > (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-06#section-14>): > > 1) The references style, as in > > "... defined by RFC4918 [RFC4918] for ..." > > looks a bit weird (artifact from a time when this document used numeric > references?) Agreed - fixed. > 2) The statement: > > "All other IANA considerations mentioned in RFC4918 [RFC4918] also > apply to this document." > > is very misleading; RFC 4918's IANA Considerations talk about URI scheme > registrations, HTTP header registrations, and HTTP status code > registrations. None of this is relevant to CardDAV, so just drop the > sentence. Yup that was a little odd. I have changed the section to simply: This document uses a URN to describe a new XML namespace conforming to the registry mechanism described in [RFC3688]. > 3) I also found the statement below confusing: > > "XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification." > > Proposal: just state: > > "XML: None - not applicable for namespace registrations". Changed. -- Cyrus Daboo
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 02:10:44 UTC