- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: 2005年2月22日 21:01:55 +0100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <421B8FB3.6050102@gmx.de>
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:37 AM, Mark Baker wrote: > >> Ah, so you're saying that ADDMEMBER isn't uniform? > > > Actually, no, I was saying that ADDMEMBER as currently defined > is identical to POST. Julian said that it wasn't identical because > his client would be able to expect one semantic, namely that a > 201 result would cause the webdav collection to contain a new > member with the given media type. That implies an additional > requirement that the target be a webdav collection, which isn't > uniform at all. I'm not sure how you get to that conclusion. ADDMEMBER (as proposed) doesn't require the target resouce to be a WebDAV collection. > ... Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:02:39 UTC