- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: 2005年2月03日 18:25:02 +0100
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- CC: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <42025E6E.7020908@gmx.de>
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > The statement that would be consistent with 3744 would be > "BIND is the same as MOVE with respect to the DAV:acl property". ...same for REBIND... > (I prefer to state it that way, rather than copying the > paragraphs from 3744, since that allows us to modify > DAV:acl behavior in 3744bis without having to revise the > binding specification). +1 > If nobody objects to that behavior, then I am happy to add > that sentence to the BIND specification. So where should that statement go (or these statements when we include UNBIND)? Should we insert a new top-level paragraph stating the behaviour? > If anyone objects to that behavior, then that is an issue > against 3744, and then I believe the BIND specification > should remain silent on the topic, and the issue should be raised > against 3744 for resolution. +1 Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:25:42 UTC