Re: REBIND example (was Re: Locks and loopback bindings)

Jim wrote on 12/03/2004 03:21:59 PM:
> > I guess this explains the confusion. The operation that 
> > you're showing here keeps the binding name (CollZ), but 
> > changes the resource to which it refers (from C1 to C2). This 
> > is neither a MOVE nor a REBIND operation.
Actually, it is a REBIND operation, but in the opposite direction.
> Ah! Thanks for figuring this out. So, REBIND really moves the head of 
the
> binding from one place to another. I was assuming it moved the tail from 
one
> place to another.
Hmmm. That's an even more obscure way of saying it (:-).
You were doing:
 BIND source-collection <source-segment, destination-URI>
which is what the spec was incorrectly updated to say, while Julian was 
doing:
 BIND destination-collection <destination-segment, source-URI>
which is what the spec originally was intended to say (to be like BIND).
> I'll have to rethink the desired example.
OK. 
Cheers,
Geoff