- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:57:49 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-Id: <200412031857.iB3IvnjP003343@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 ------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de 2004年12月03日 10:57 ------- That's an interesting point. I do agree that if we need special treatment for locks in bind loops, we probably need to include them in BIND. However, I wasn't aware that there actually *is* a special treatment. This issue needs to be discussed before we make the next step. Regarding the other issue: again, I'm not sure what the issue is, and how it would be different from what we have in RFC2518. Please supply an example. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 18:57:49 UTC